Your chronological age tells you how many years you have lived.
Your heart age asks a different question: how old does your cardiovascular risk profile behave?
Two Indians of the same age can have dramatically different cardiovascular risk.
A 42-year-old with a healthy waist, normal blood pressure, favourable ApoB, good glucose control, adequate physical activity and no smoking exposure may have a substantially healthier cardiovascular profile than another 42-year-old with abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins.
That is the thinking behind the Indian Heart Age — 6-Marker Framework.
Rather than looking at one laboratory number in isolation, the framework brings together six practical dimensions of cardiovascular health that are particularly relevant to Indian adults:
The Six Markers
Marker |
What it tells us |
Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
1. Waist Circumference |
Visceral/adipose risk |
Indians can develop metabolic risk at relatively lower BMI |
2. Blood Pressure |
Vascular pressure load |
Persistent hypertension accelerates cardiovascular risk |
3. ApoB / Atherogenic Lipoproteins |
Number of cholesterol-containing particles |
Helps quantify atherogenic particle burden |
4. HbA1c / Glucose Status |
Long-term glycaemic exposure |
Detects diabetes and prediabetes risk |
5. Triglycerides / HDL-C Pattern |
Metabolic health |
Often reflects insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk |
6. Physical Activity / Cardiorespiratory Fitness |
Functional cardiovascular reserve |
Fitness strongly influences long-term cardiovascular health |
Together, these six markers create a more complete picture than any single “cholesterol number.”
Proposed structure
Domain |
Points |
What it represents |
|---|---|---|
Waist circumference |
0–20 |
Central adiposity |
ApoB |
0–25 |
Atherogenic particle burden |
Lp(a) |
0–15 |
Inherited risk |
Blood pressure |
0–15 |
Vascular pressure load |
HbA1c |
0–15 |
Glycaemic/metabolic stress |
TG/HDL-C |
0–10 |
Insulin-resistant lipid phenotype |
TOTAL |
100 |
Composite screening score |
Proposed interpretation
Score |
Indian Heart Age interpretation |
|---|---|
0–19 |
🟢 Lower-risk phenotype |
20–39 |
🟢 Mild early-risk signals |
40–59 |
🟡 Metabolic/atherogenic warning |
60–74 |
🟠 High-risk phenotype |
≥75 |
🔴 Very high-risk phenotype — clinical assessment recommended |
Important: these score bands are proposed design parameters, not validated clinical thresholds.
Check Your Risk Score for Heart Health
1. WAIST — 20 points
Men
| Waist | Points |
|---|---|
| <78 cm | 0 |
| 78–84.9 | 5 |
| 85–89.9 | 10 |
| 90–99.9 | 15 |
| ≥100 | 20 |
Women
| Waist | Points |
|---|---|
| <72 cm | 0 |
| 72–79.9 | 5 |
| 80–89.9 | 15 |
| ≥90 | 20 |
This deliberately uses Indian-specific thresholds rather than Western BMI/waist assumptions.
2. ApoB — 25 points
For the screening algorithm, I would avoid simply copying treatment targets. A preliminary scoring architecture could be:
| ApoB | Points |
|---|---|
| <80 mg/dL | 0 |
| 80–99 | 5 |
| 100–119 | 10 |
| 120–139 | 15 |
| 140–159 | 20 |
| ≥160 | 25 |
This makes ApoB the largest component because it directly represents atherogenic particle number and has particularly compelling relevance to South Asian risk.
3. Lp(a) — 15 points
This should be treated differently.
| Lp(a) | Points |
|---|---|
| <30 mg/dL | 0 |
| 30–49 | 5 |
| 50–74 | 10 |
| ≥75 | 15 |
4. Blood Pressure — 15 points
Use the average of properly measured readings, rather than a single casual reading.
| BP phenotype | Points |
|---|---|
| <120/<80 | 0 |
| 120–129 / <80 | 3 |
| 130–139 or 80–89 | 7 |
| 140–159 or 90–99 | 12 |
| ≥160 or ≥100 | 15 |
A confirmed diagnosis of hypertension should trigger clinical management rather than simply increasing the score.
5. HbA1c — 15 points
| HbA1c | Points |
|---|---|
| <5.7% | 0 |
| 5.7–6.0% | 5 |
| 6.1–6.4% | 10 |
| ≥6.5% | 15 |
Again, ≥6.5% should not simply be treated as “15 points.”
It should trigger the message: “This result may indicate diabetes and requires appropriate clinical confirmation/assessment.” Our Algorithm should never encourage someone to treat a potentially diagnostic result as merely a wellness score.
6. TG/HDL-C — 10 points
Because Indian/South Asian research has specifically examined this ratio, it makes sense as the final metabolic component.
Men
| TG/HDL-C | Points |
|---|---|
| <2.0 | 0 |
| 2.0–2.9 | 2 |
| 3.0–3.4 | 5 |
| 3.5–4.9 | 8 |
| ≥5.0 | 10 |
Women
| TG/HDL-C | Points |
|---|---|
| <1.5 | 0 |
| 1.5–1.9 | 2 |
| 2.0–2.4 | 5 |
| 2.5–3.9 | 8 |
| ≥4.0 | 10 |
The 3.5/2.5 thresholds have published South Asian data behind them.
THE REALLY INTERESTING PART: HEART AGE
Report: Your Indian Heart Score: 62/100
and: Risk phenotype: High
Then identify the drivers:
Your top 3 modifiable signals
-
ApoB — 128 mg/dL
-
Waist — 96 cm
-
HbA1c — 6.1%

